Review an AI Report: Check Numbers, Sources, and Causal Claims
Check an AI report against its source data, recalculate totals and rates, and use a copyable review prompt to flag unsupported claims and overstated causes before submission.
Learn how to turn short source text into an AI PPT presentation structure without adding unsupported facts, create a prompt for a 6-slide outline with one key message, evidence, speaker notes, and visual suggestions, and manually review numbers, interpretations, images, and sensitive information.
Who this is forBeginners who want to use AI to turn meeting, event, or work-related source text into a presentation draft
When creating a PPT presentation with AI, the first step is not choosing a design but defining the boundary of what can be said from the source text. In this exercise, we will create a 6-slide presentation outline and speaker notes from three statements about a fictional library book club. Information that has not yet been decided, such as the date or budget, should be explicitly restricted in the prompt so that AI does not fill it in naturally on its own.
S1. In August 2026, 24 people were invited to a library book club meeting, and 18 actually attended.
S2. After the event, 12 of the 18 attendees each responded once to an anonymous survey, and 9 of them said they wanted to participate in the next meeting.
S3. The date and budget for the next meeting have not yet been decided.The values that can be calculated directly from the source are an attendance rate of 18÷24=75% and a next-meeting interest rate of 9÷12=75% among survey respondents. However, we cannot know how many of all 18 attendees wanted to attend the next meeting. That is because we do not know the intentions of attendees who did not respond to the survey.
For a presentation prompt, it is easier to review the result if you specify the number of slides, slide order, evidence notation, and prohibited inferences instead of simply writing, 'Make a 6-slide PPT.' In presentations that contain numbers, especially, the sentence should preserve which group was used as the denominator.
Using only the source text below, create a draft 6-slide presentation.
Slide order:
1. Purpose
2. Attendance
3. Survey
4. Limitations
5. Next actions
6. Decision
For each slide, include the following:
- Title
- One key message: one sentence
- Evidence: the relevant S1, S2, or S3 number
- Speaker notes: 2–3 sentences for the presenter to say
- Visual suggestion: table, number, simple shape, etc.
Constraints:
- Do not invent dates, budgets, reasons, satisfaction levels, or effects that are not in the source text.
- Express the attendance rate as 18/24=75%.
- Express interest in the next meeting as '9 out of 12 survey respondents, 75%.'
- Do not change this to '75% of all attendees wanted the next meeting.'
- State that the interest rate among all attendees cannot be calculated because the intentions of survey nonrespondents are unknown.
- Keep the date and budget undecided.
- Separate facts from suggestions at the sentence level.
Source text:
S1. In August 2026, 24 people were invited to a library book club meeting, and 18 actually attended.
S2. After the event, 12 of the 18 attendees each responded once to an anonymous survey, and 9 of them said they wanted to participate in the next meeting.
S3. The date and budget for the next meeting have not yet been decided.The content below is not the result of running a specific AI product. It is an example written manually by an editor to satisfy the constraints above. When you use an AI-generated draft, you can review it in the same way by comparing it line by line with the source text.
| Slide | Title | One key message | Evidence | Speaker notes | Visual suggestion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Purpose | Connect Book Club Results to the Next Operating Decision | The purpose of this presentation is to review attendance and survey results and identify the items that need to be decided for the next meeting. | S1, S2, S3 | This presentation focuses on organizing the numbers we can currently confirm rather than exaggerating the event's performance. At the end, we will leave the still-undecided date and budget as decision items. | Show the purpose in one sentence and display the 6-slide flow as a simple sequence diagram |
| 2. Attendance | 24 Invited, 18 Attended | The attendance rate for the August 2026 book club meeting was 75%. | S1 | There were 24 invited participants and 18 actual attendees. Dividing 18 by 24 gives an attendance rate of 75%. This figure only shows attendance and does not represent satisfaction or the effect of the event. | Display 24 → 18 and 75% as large numbers |
| 3. Survey | 9 of 12 Respondents Want the Next Meeting | Among anonymous survey respondents, 75% said they wanted to participate in the next meeting. | S2 | There were 12 survey respondents, and 9 of them wanted to participate in the next meeting. Therefore, the rate among respondents is 75%. We should not expand this into a rate for all attendees. | Show 9 out of 12 as 9/12 or 75% |
| 4. Limitations | Respondent Results Cannot Be Converted into Results for All Attendees | Because we do not know the intentions of attendees who did not answer the survey, we cannot conclude the interest rate among all attendees. | S1, S2 | There were 18 attendees but only 12 survey respondents. The source text does not tell us whether the remaining attendees wanted to participate in the next meeting. Therefore, dividing 9 by 18 and presenting it as the interest rate for all attendees would be incorrect. | Use a simple diagram that separates 18 attendees from 12 respondents |
| 5. Next Actions | More Information Is Needed to Decide the Date and Budget | The date and budget for the next meeting are still undecided and require separate decisions. | S3 | The current record does not allow us to specify the date or budget for the next event. Possible date options and budget proposals need to be collected before a decision is made. If any options are presented here, they should be labeled as suggestions rather than source facts. | Show Date: Undecided and Budget: Undecided as checklist items |
| 6. Decision | Separate Confirmed Facts from Undecided Items | Share the confirmed attendance and survey numbers, and leave the next meeting schedule and budget as separate decision items. | S1, S2, S3 | The confirmed facts are a 75% attendance rate and a 75% next-meeting interest rate among survey respondents. In contrast, the interest rate among all attendees, the next date, and the budget cannot be confirmed. It is better to handle these three items separately in the meeting. | Divide the slide into two columns: Confirmed facts and Decisions needed |
Editor-written result example summary
- Attendance: 24 invited, 18 attended, attendance rate 75%
- Survey: 12 responded, 9 want the next meeting, 75% among respondents
- Limitation: interest rate among all attendees cannot be confirmed
- Undecided: date and budget for the next meeting
- Presentation structure: Purpose → Attendance → Survey → Limitations → Next actions → Decision
Note: This example is not an actual AI execution result. It was written by an editor to demonstrate the review method.One of the most dangerous errors in AI presentation material is when the arithmetic is correct but the denominator changes. 9÷12 and 9÷18 answer different questions. The source tells us only that 9 of the 12 survey respondents wanted the next meeting.
Incorrect example:
75% of all attendees said they wanted to participate in the next book club meeting.This sentence must be corrected. The denominator for 75% is not all 18 attendees but the 12 survey respondents. The correct wording is, '9 out of 12 survey respondents, or 75% of respondents, said they wanted to participate in the next meeting.' The interest rate among all attendees cannot be concluded because the intentions of nonrespondents are unknown.
Number review checklist
[ ] Does the invited count of 24 match source S1?
[ ] Does the attendance count of 18 match source S1?
[ ] Is the attendance rate calculated as 18/24=75%?
[ ] Does the survey response count of 12 match source S2?
[ ] Does the next-meeting interest count of 9 match source S2?
[ ] Is the interest rate calculated as 9/12=75%?
[ ] Has '75% of respondents' remained separate from '75% of all attendees'?
[ ] Have the date and budget remained unfilled rather than being invented?A presentation draft should be reviewed not only for numbers but also for the type of each statement. 'The attendance rate was 75%' is a fact that can be calculated from the source. In contrast, statements such as 'Saturday afternoon would be good for the next meeting' or 'Increasing the budget would increase attendance' are not supported by this source. If such statements are needed, they should be labeled separately as 'Suggestions' or 'Items for further review.'
Content review checklist
[ ] Can each key statement be linked to S1, S2, or S3 as evidence?
[ ] Have causes or effects not contained in the source been avoided as factual claims?
[ ] Have the undecided date and budget remained unconfirmed?
[ ] Are suggestions labeled as 'suggestion,' 'review,' or 'decision needed' so they are distinct from facts?
[ ] Has unnecessary personally identifiable information been removed?
[ ] Has permission been checked for any external image used?
[ ] Where possible, are self-created tables, number cards, or shapes used to present the information?The final step in this exercise is to manually move the reviewed text into an actual presentation tool. This article does not assume any specific product's automatic generation feature or automatic PPTX creation. First finalize the text draft, then adjust layout and visual elements manually in the presentation tool.
In AI PPT work, maintaining traceability between the source text and presentation material is more important than filling slides quickly. If you keep the evidence S-number for each slide, it becomes easier to return to the source when a number changes or a sentence becomes overstated. Even if you hide the evidence numbers from the final presentation screen, it is safer to retain them in your editorial review notes.
A document-review exercise using fictional library book club source statements S1–S3 and an editor-written 6-slide presentation example
The 6-slide result in the article is not output generated and verified by running a specific AI service. It is an example written by an editor to explain the prompt and review process. This article does not cover actual PPTX file creation, verification of features in a specific presentation product, or evaluation of design quality.