This exercise shows how to define constraints such as participant count, time, printed materials, purchasing limits, and available equipment before asking AI for 4 distinct alternatives. Instead of deciding which idea is best, you check whether each option satisfies the constraints and learn how to revise the request when the constraints change.
Content checked 2026.09.23Copyable prompts
Show contents
Who this is forBeginners who want several realistic alternatives that respect practical constraints rather than a vague list of ideas
What you need
The activity is fictional and does not require actual purchases or equipment use.
No executable program code is used.
Do not assume AI guarantees that an idea is feasible.
01Write Down the Fixed Constraints Before Generating Ideas
The fictional task is to design a beginner reading activity for a library. In brainstorming, it is easier to review the results if you first lock the conditions that must be satisfied instead of simply asking for 'lots of good ideas.' Here, the constraints are 8 participants, a total of 30 minutes, a maximum of 16 printed sheets, no additional purchases, and only paper and pens as equipment.
Sample input
[Fictional activity design constraints]
S1: There are 8 participants.
S2: The entire activity lasts 30 minutes.
S3: A maximum of 16 printed sheets may be used.
S4: No additional purchases are allowed.
S5: The only available equipment is paper and pens.
Goal: Generate 4 alternative reading activities suitable for beginners.
Note: The task is to create distinct alternatives, not to select the best one.
source ID
constraint
how to check it
S1
8 participants
Check whether group assignments and handouts are based on 8 participants
S2
Total 30 minutes
Check whether the sum of all step times is 30 minutes
S3
Maximum 16 printed sheets
Check whether the total printed materials for each idea are 16 sheets or fewer
S4
No additional purchases
Check whether any new materials or paid items are required
S5
Paper and pens only
Check whether extra equipment such as a projector, smartphone, or speaker is required
02Ask for 4 Alternatives with Different Activity Formats
Without explicit constraints, AI may repeat essentially the same activity under different names. State that the 4 ideas should differ in their activity structure, and ask for the sequence, minute-by-minute timing, number of printed sheets, and unresolved conditions for each one.
Prompt
Create 4 beginner reading activity ideas that satisfy all of the following constraints.
S1: 8 participants
S2: Total 30 minutes
S3: Maximum 16 printed sheets
S4: No additional purchases
S5: Paper and pens only
Requirements:
1. The 4 ideas must use different activity formats.
2. For each idea, list the steps and give the time for each step in minutes.
3. Make the step times add up to exactly 30 minutes.
4. State the total number of printed sheets and confirm that it is 16 or fewer.
5. Include at least 1 condition that a person must verify before implementation.
6. Do not add equipment or materials on your own.
7. Do not rank the ideas or conclude that any 1 idea is the best.
8. Do not claim that feasibility is guaranteed.
This request combines idea generation with constraint checking, but it still does not verify the actual space, participants' reading levels, or the content of available documents. That is why it is important to keep an 'unverified condition' field in the result.
03Check the Time and Printed-Material Counts in 4 Editorial Examples
The 4 alternatives below are editorial examples showing different activity structures. Each is set to 30 minutes and uses no more than 16 printed sheets, but suitability for real participants and smooth operation in an actual setting have not been verified.
Example result
[Editorial example created and reviewed with AI assistance — not a validation of actual implementation performance]
Idea A: Mark 1 sentence and explain it to a partner
- 5 minutes: Read a short text and mark 1 memorable sentence
- 8 minutes: Write notes explaining why you chose it
- 10 minutes: Work in pairs and explain your choices to each other
- 5 minutes: Each pair records 1 point they had in common
- 2 minutes: Closing
Total 30 minutes
Printed materials: 8 copies of the reading text
Unverified: Need to confirm whether the reading level is appropriate for beginners
Idea B: Create your own question card
- 5 minutes: Read a short text
- 7 minutes: Each participant writes 1 question on paper
- 10 minutes: Split into 2 groups of 4 and take turns answering the questions
- 6 minutes: Each group selects and records 1 memorable question
- 2 minutes: Closing
Total 30 minutes
Printed materials: 8 reading sheets + 8 instruction sheets = 16 sheets
Unverified: Need to confirm whether participants are comfortable creating their own questions
Idea C: Build a shared summary without printed materials
- 5 minutes: The facilitator reads a prepared short text 1 sentence at a time while participants note keywords
- 8 minutes: Each participant selects 3 keywords
- 10 minutes: Split into 2 groups of 4 and write a shared summary
- 5 minutes: The 2 groups read their summaries to each other
- 2 minutes: Closing
Total 30 minutes
Printed materials: 0 sheets
Unverified: Need to confirm whether the facilitator can prepare an appropriate text to read aloud in advance
Idea D: Reconstruct the sequence of scenes
- 4 minutes: Read a short story
- 6 minutes: Each participant notes 3 key scenes
- 10 minutes: Split into 2 groups of 4 and discuss the order of the scenes
- 8 minutes: Each group writes down its chosen order and reasons
- 2 minutes: Closing
Total 30 minutes
Printed materials: 8 copies of the reading text
Unverified: Need to confirm whether the selected story is suitable for discussing scene order
idea
activity format
total time
printed materials
constraint check
unverified condition
A
Individual marking followed by partner explanation
30 minutes
8 sheets
30 minutes or less; 16 sheets or fewer
Reading difficulty
B
Create questions individually, then discuss in groups
30 minutes
16 sheets
30 minutes or less; 16 sheets or fewer
Comfort with creating questions
C
Keyword notes followed by a shared summary
30 minutes
0 sheets
30 minutes or less; 16 sheets or fewer
Whether a suitable read-aloud text can be prepared
D
Reconstruct scene order
30 minutes
8 sheets
30 minutes or less; 16 sheets or fewer
Story suitability
04Check Constraint Violations Before Judging Whether an Idea Looks Fun
When reviewing brainstorming results, first check the numbers and conditions rather than deciding which idea looks most interesting. In this exercise, confirm that each activity stays within 30 minutes, uses no more than 16 printed sheets, and does not require extra equipment or purchases.
check
A
B
C
D
Based on 8 participants
Meets
Meets
Meets
Meets
30 minutes or less
30 minutes
30 minutes
30 minutes
30 minutes
16 printed sheets or fewer
8 sheets
16 sheets
0 sheets
8 sheets
No additional purchases
None in the example
None in the example
None in the example
None in the example
No equipment beyond paper and pens
None in the example
None in the example
None in the example
None in the example
Feasibility validation
Not conducted
Not conducted
Not conducted
Not conducted
Here, 'none in the example' does not mean that no additional preparation would ever be needed in a real setting. It only means that the written activity plan does not explicitly require extra items. A person still needs to verify on-site conditions such as space, noise, and participants' reading levels.
05Revise a Constraint-Violating Answer or Update the Constraints
AI can produce an interesting idea while overlooking numerical limits. In that case, you do not have to discard the entire idea. Specify which constraints were violated and ask for only those parts to be corrected. If the real situation changes and the constraints themselves are different, clearly state only the changed values and ask AI to preserve the rest.
Flawed result
[Incorrect editorial example]
Activity E: Give each of 8 participants 3 colored cards and use tablets to search for book covers.
- Explanation 5 minutes
- Individual search 10 minutes
- Group activity 12 minutes
- Presentation 8 minutes
Total 35 minutes
Printed materials needed: 24 activity sheets
Materials: colored cards, tablets, paper, pens
This answer exceeds the 30-minute limit in S2 by 5 minutes and exceeds the 16-sheet maximum in S3 by 8 sheets. It also introduces materials that violate S4, no additional purchases, and S5, paper and pens only. Regardless of how interesting the activity may seem, it cannot be used as written because it violates the constraints.
Prompt
Revise the previous idea so it fits the constraints.
- Keep 8 participants.
- Recalculate the total time so it is 30 minutes or less.
- Reduce printed materials to 16 sheets or fewer.
- Remove all materials that require additional purchases.
- Remove all equipment other than paper and pens.
- After revising, show the step-by-step time total and total number of printed sheets again.
- Do not claim that feasibility is guaranteed; keep an unverified condition.
If the constraints themselves change, modify only the conditions I changed and keep the rest of S1-S5 unchanged.
06Checklist for the Reader Before Choosing Any Option
The purpose of this article is not to recommend or rank 1 of the 4 alternatives. The goal is to first obtain distinct ideas that satisfy the constraints, then let a person verify the actual setting and participant conditions before selecting or revising an option. The results in this article are editorial examples created and reviewed with AI assistance; they do not validate actual satisfaction, participation, educational effect, or AI product performance.
Checklist
[Reader checklist]
□ Are there exactly 4 ideas?
□ Do the 4 ideas use genuinely different activity formats?
□ Is the participant count still 8?
□ Did I manually add up the step times for each idea?
□ Is each total 30 minutes or less?
□ Is the printed-material total for each idea 16 sheets or fewer?
□ Are there no items that require additional purchases?
□ Is there no equipment other than paper and pens?
□ Does each idea include an unverified condition to check before implementation?
□ Was no arbitrary 'best idea' or ranking added?
□ Is there no claim that feasibility is guaranteed?
□ When changing constraints, did I separate the changed conditions from those that must remain unchanged?
What to check yourself
Editorial-example review scope: compared the 4 alternatives against the constraints of 8 participants, total 30 minutes, maximum 16 printed sheets, no additional purchases, and paper and pens only.
Included 4 ideas
Confirmed a 30-minute total for each idea
Printed-material counts are 8 sheets, 16 sheets, 0 sheets, and 8 sheets, all within the 16-sheet limit
No additional purchases required
No equipment required beyond paper and pens
Included an unverified condition for each idea
Did not provide a ranking or final selection
Verification limits
The activities were not carried out in an actual library or with actual participants, and feasibility, satisfaction, effectiveness, safety, and AI product performance were not validated. Before real use, a person must verify the space, participant characteristics, and available materials directly.
This exercise uses AI to compare V1 and V2 of the same event notice and classify five comparison items as changed, added, deleted, or unchanged. You will learn how to record only differences that actually appear in the documents without assuming why a deleted sentence disappeared.
This exercise turns a short notice into six FAQ entries. Questions supported by the source receive source IDs, while topics such as fees, refunds, and waitlists that do not appear in the notice are left as needs confirmation instead of being answered from assumptions.
This exercise classifies six short free-text comments into predefined themes and allows multiple labels when one response contains more than one topic. It also explains why the total number of labels can exceed the number of respondents and how to avoid unsupported conclusions about satisfaction or emotional intensity.
This exercise rewrites four fictional borrowing rules in clearer language while preserving the registered-member requirement, the 7-day deadline, the prohibition on extending reserved materials, and the rule that non-reserved materials may be submitted for one extension request without guaranteeing approval.
This exercise shows how to break a vague research goal into factual questions, experience questions, and decision questions, then plan what to verify and where to look. Instead of asking AI to invent search results, you first organize the sources to check and the items that are still unknown.
This exercise shows how to design a 15-minute user interview for improving a fictional application form. You will revise leading questions into neutral questions about recent real behavior and learn not to treat predicted responses as evidence before any interviews have been conducted.
This exercise shows how to prepare 6 expected audience questions with source evidence, short answers, and a verification plan when the answer is unknown. It does not cover creating a presentation outline or AI voice evaluation; the focus is on answering questions without overstating limited evidence.