Find duplicate Excel rows and separate them for review
Find rows with exact matches in all four columns and collect them in a new Excel file with their original row numbers. Review each duplicate group, including its first occurrence.
Validate dates and work hours in a CSV, then save monthly record counts and total hours as a CSV and a bar chart.
This translation was generated by AI. Check the code, units, and numbers against the original. Native-speaker review has not yet been completed for each language. 한국어
Who this is forStaff who move tables and numbers into reports, meeting materials, or work notices
The result you will complete is not a report packed with numbers, but a table and explanatory sentences that readers can understand the same way at first reading. First fix the scope of the table, check the calculations, and write the sentences with units last. Following this order reduces cases where different bases get mixed, such as a table based on August data and text based on July.
Even if the numbers themselves are right, you cannot compare them if they count different things. This example counts “requests received in each month that were completed by the end of the same month.” Requests received in the previous month and completed this month are not included. Keeping this definition under the table connects the completed count to the received count, which is its denominator.
| Period | Received | Completed | Completion rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| July 2026 | 120 | 96 | 80.0 % |
| August 2026 | 150 | 123 | 82.0 % |
7월 완료율 = 96 ÷ 120 × 100 = 80.0 %
8월 완료율 = 123 ÷ 150 × 100 = 82.0 %
완료율 차이 = 82.0 − 80.0 = +2.0 %p
접수량 증가율 = (150 − 120) ÷ 120 × 100 = 25.0 %Example sentence: “The completion rate, based on requests received in the same month, rose 2.0 pp from 80.0 % in July to 82.0 % in August. Received requests increased 25.0 % from 120 to 150.” Here, the 2.5 % relative increase in completion rate and the 2.0 pp difference in completion rate are different calculations. Choose the expression that fits the purpose of the report and label it.
| Source data | Conversion | In the document |
|---|---|---|
| Length 1.25 m | 1.25 × 1000 | Length 1250 mm |
| Mass 2450 g | 2450 ÷ 1000 | Mass 2.45 kg |
| Temperature 23.5 °C | No unit conversion | Temperature 23.5 °C |
If you change the column title to mm but leave the value as 1.25, it means something 1,000 times different from the original length. When you change the unit of an entire table, check the values, column title, footnotes, and text together. If a table uses only one unit, you can state it in the title, such as “Length (mm),” instead of repeating the symbol in every cell.
BIPM's SI Brochure explains the principles of a space between the number and the unit symbol, consistent use of unit symbols, and a uniform number format within the same table column. Write 23.5 °C, and distinguish mm from m or MPa from Pa. For amounts and counts in work documents, follow your organization's style, but state the currency and any multiplier such as thousands or millions.
| Symptom | Cause | How to fix it |
|---|---|---|
| Wrote only that the completion rate increased 2 % | Did not distinguish relative increase from pp difference | Write the formula together with the metric name |
| Changed every blank to 0 | Treated not-yet-counted and an actual result of 0 as the same | Check the status of the source data and mark it as unconfirmed |
| The total is larger than the source data | Subtotals and detail rows were both added | Re-specify the rows included in the total |
| The value is right but the unit is different | Only the table title was changed | Check the conversion of the values, title, and text together |
| The table and the summary numbers differ | Only part of the revision was applied | Search the whole document for the same metric |
This check is a procedure for finding errors in the process of moving numbers into a document. It does not verify gaps in the source data, the validity of work definitions, or the calibration of measuring equipment. If values conflict, do not pick the one that looks better; record both sources and the difference. If a statutory form or a contract requires specific unit or rounding rules, check those rules separately.
References were checked on the official pages on September 19, 2026. The 2026 update on the BIPM page and NIST's style guidance were used as the basis for the unit explanations. The rest of the work steps and the synthetic example were written for this article.
Windows local Python standard library; official sources checked 2026-09-19
Includes code, input data, and instructions. Extract the ZIP and read README.txt first.
Download example ZIPExample code, filenames, and input keys remain unchanged. Refer to the commands and checking steps in the translated article as well.
The explanations and examples were written for this site. See the official sources below for the related behavior and concepts.